Discussion:
NATINYAHO HAD A HAND IN THE KILLINGS IN BENGHAZI
(too old to reply)
Aviroce
2012-11-17 13:41:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
NATINYAHO HAD A HAND IN THE KILLINGS IN BENGHAZI
By Aviroce

I still contend the killing of our ambassador was a calculated act
against the United States by Israel to induce or corner the United
States to attack Iran. As I mentioned in my articles the presence of
Natinyaho in the US and his "rhetoric and slander of Islam" while he
was questioned by two TV stations, ABC and NBC on Sunday demonstrate
both the attack on Islam and Muslims through a bankrupt film maker
was
planned by Israel and so was the Benghazi incident. Notice the word
"tenuous" in the article. Information is not yet fully gathered and
there remains the trace of dollars to the film maker.


Aviroce
Meister Moto
2012-11-18 00:03:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Aviroce
NATINYAHO HAD A HAND IN THE KILLINGS IN BENGHAZI
By Aviroce
I still contend the killing of our ambassador was a calculated act
against the United States by Israel to induce or corner the United
States to attack Iran.  As I mentioned in my articles the presence of
Natinyaho in the US and his "rhetoric and slander of Islam" while he
was questioned by two TV stations, ABC and NBC on Sunday demonstrate
both the attack on Islam and Muslims through a bankrupt film maker
was
planned by Israel and so was the Benghazi incident.  Notice the word
"tenuous" in the article.  Information is not yet fully gathered and
there remains the trace of dollars to the film maker.
Aviroce
Of course he was involved. Just as israel has been involved in funding
and arming the insurgents in all countries right across the top of
Africa.

There will be no peace or stability in the Middle East (or the world,
for that matter) until this terrorist regime is dealt with.
Aviroce
2012-11-18 01:31:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
That is right. Israel is pushing for WWIII at the expense of the
United States of America. Obama has said "No." I think he will
adhere to "No."

Mind you WWII was started by Jews. Jews were dispossessed of power
when the Socialist German Party under Hitler took power. Hitler was
able to get such power because the Germans and Austrians, native
citizens were emasculated by the Jews to the point where the only
gatekeepers were Jews. Hitler reversed that and Jews hated him to the
point of enticing England to take Germany as a colony with their
internal help. England thought that would then be easy just like the
Balfour Declaration that helped Jews colonize Palestine. So England
gave the War Power Act to Poland. Poland invades Germany and Germany
invades Poland. Now England invades Germany and Germany invades
England. WWII erupts. USA joined the war at a later time and that
was timely to be the victor. Everyone lost. Only USA won. Jews
begged USA to create Israel and USA responded affirmatively.
Post by Meister Moto
Post by Aviroce
NATINYAHO HAD A HAND IN THE KILLINGS IN BENGHAZI
By Aviroce
I still contend the killing of our ambassador was a calculated act
against the United States by Israel to induce or corner the United
States to attack Iran.  As I mentioned in my articles the presence of
Natinyaho in the US and his "rhetoric and slander of Islam" while he
was questioned by two TV stations, ABC and NBC on Sunday demonstrate
both the attack on Islam and Muslims through a bankrupt film maker
was
planned by Israel and so was the Benghazi incident.  Notice the word
"tenuous" in the article.  Information is not yet fully gathered and
there remains the trace of dollars to the film maker.
Aviroce
Of course he was involved. Just as israel has been involved in funding
and arming the insurgents in all countries right across the top of
Africa.
There will be no peace or stability in the Middle East (or the world,
for that matter) until this terrorist regime is dealt with.
Meister Moto
2012-11-18 06:41:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
That is right.  Israel is pushing for WWIII at the expense of the
United States of America.  Obama has said "No."   I think he will
adhere to "No."
Mind you WWII was started by Jews.  Jews were dispossessed of power
when the Socialist German Party under Hitler took power.  Hitler was
able to get such power because the Germans and Austrians, native
citizens were emasculated by the Jews to the point where the only
gatekeepers were Jews.  Hitler reversed that and Jews hated him to the
point of enticing England to take Germany as a colony with their
internal help.  England thought that would then be easy just like the
Balfour Declaration that helped Jews colonize Palestine.  So England
gave the War Power Act to Poland.  Poland invades Germany and Germany
invades Poland. Now England invades Germany and Germany invades
England.  WWII erupts.  USA joined the war at a later time and that
was timely to be the victor.  Everyone lost.  Only USA won.  Jews
begged USA to create Israel and USA responded affirmatively.
Post by Meister Moto
Post by Aviroce
NATINYAHO HAD A HAND IN THE KILLINGS IN BENGHAZI
By Aviroce
I still contend the killing of our ambassador was a calculated act
against the United States by Israel to induce or corner the United
States to attack Iran.  As I mentioned in my articles the presence of
Natinyaho in the US and his "rhetoric and slander of Islam" while he
was questioned by two TV stations, ABC and NBC on Sunday demonstrate
both the attack on Islam and Muslims through a bankrupt film maker
was
planned by Israel and so was the Benghazi incident.  Notice the word
"tenuous" in the article.  Information is not yet fully gathered and
there remains the trace of dollars to the film maker.
Aviroce
Of course he was involved. Just as israel has been involved in funding
and arming the insurgents in all countries right across the top of
Africa.
There will be no peace or stability in the Middle East (or the world,
for that matter) until this terrorist regime is dealt with.
World War II was only an extension of World War I, which was also
started by jews.
NoSpamAtAll
2012-11-18 18:52:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <6d4dde6f-99dc-4cf3-9f42-***@g7g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>,
Meister Moto <***@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

Why are you murdering innocent people, aussie filth?

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/auspac/07/31/australia.woomera/
"CANBERRA, Australia (CNN) -- A United Nations human rights envoy
has slammed conditions in Australia's Woomera detention camp, saying
the situation there in many cases was 'inhuman and degrading'".

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/oct2001/refu-o13.shtml
"Australian navy fires on refugee boat".

Australia's culpability in East Timor's genocide
------------------------------------------------
http://www.pcug.org.au/~wildwood/earlyviva.htm
"Australian governments all sought to influence the destiny of East
Timor. This destiny became one of the longest ongoing acts of genocide
since the European Holocaust of the Second World War. I am reminded of
the French Vichy Government of that war which supplied and organised
the freight train convoys that carried persecuted Jews to the Nazi
ovens. Canberra's warts-and-all allegiance with Jakarta; the almost $2
billion in bilateral aid; the million of dollars in military gifts,
defence training and defence co-operation; and the political lobbying
in the international arena for Jakarta's position, all helped to
create a similar cattlewagon, transporting the East Timorese to their
diabolical fate." Jim Aubrey, editor, 'Free East Timor: Australia's
culpability in East Timor's genocide'.

"The second consequence of British settlement was
appropriation of land and water resources. The combination
of disease, loss of land and direct violence reduced the
Aboriginal population by up to 80% between 1788 and 1900.
A wave of massacres and resistance followed the frontier
of British settlement. By the 1870s all the fertile areas
of Australia had been appropriated, and Indigenous communities
reduced to impoverished remnants living either on the fringes
of Australian communities or on lands considered unsuitable
for settlement".
(from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians)
Aviroce
2012-11-19 17:19:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
You have been slaughtering Palestinians left and right and stealing
their land and properties. Palestinians have said, "Enough is
enough."
         [...]
         Why are you murdering innocent people,  aussie filth?
   http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/auspac/07/31/australia.woo...
   "CANBERRA, Australia (CNN) -- A United Nations human rights envoy
has slammed conditions in Australia's Woomera detention camp, saying
the situation there in many cases was 'inhuman and degrading'".
   http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/oct2001/refu-o13.shtml
   "Australian navy fires on refugee boat".
   Australia's culpability in East Timor's genocide
   ------------------------------------------------
   http://www.pcug.org.au/~wildwood/earlyviva.htm
   "Australian governments all sought to influence the destiny of East
Timor. This destiny became one of the longest ongoing acts of genocide
since the European Holocaust of the Second World War. I am reminded of
the French Vichy Government of that war which supplied and organised
the freight train convoys that carried persecuted Jews to the Nazi
ovens. Canberra's warts-and-all allegiance with Jakarta; the almost $2
billion in bilateral aid; the million of dollars in military gifts,
defence training and defence co-operation; and the political lobbying
in the international arena for Jakarta's position, all helped to
create a similar cattlewagon, transporting the East Timorese to their
diabolical fate." Jim Aubrey, editor, 'Free East Timor: Australia's
culpability in East Timor's genocide'.
         "The second consequence of British settlement was
appropriation of land and water resources. The combination
of disease, loss of land and direct violence reduced the
Aboriginal population by up to 80% between 1788 and 1900.
A wave of massacres and resistance followed the frontier
of British settlement. By the 1870s all the fertile areas
of Australia had been appropriated, and Indigenous communities
reduced to impoverished remnants living either on the fringes
of Australian communities or on lands considered unsuitable
for settlement".
(fromhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians)
Loading...